House passes FDA user fee reauthorization, Senate schedule unclear

The House has passed legislation to reauthorize user fee programs through the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) affecting medical devices, prescription and generic drugs.

Without the bill being signed into law, the FDA’s authority to collect user fees from companies it regulates would expire at the end of September. The agency has warned that unless its enacted by the end of July, it would need to lay off thousands of FDA employees. The bill had enough support in the House to pass by voice vote.

“This bipartisan work has produced a big win for patients,” said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Oregon, said in a statement. The bill “will help bring lower-cost generic drug alternatives and biosimilars to market faster – increasing competition and lowering drug costs – and it will streamline the process for reviewing and approving new treatments and cures for patients, ultimately delivering new and innovative therapies, drugs, and devices to patients more quickly.”

The passage was also praised by FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD. The Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance (MITA) was also pleased, which supported the FDA’s continued authority on new indications for imaging device manufacturers and the provision requiring a report on quality and safety of devices.

“The medical imaging community has long advocated for enhanced predictability, consistency, transparency and timeliness of the agency’s pre-market approval and clearance process for medical imaging technologies and other devices,” said Joe Robinson, chairman of the MITA board of directors and senior vice president of health systems solutions at Philips Healthcare. “MITA and its members believe that all MDUFA commitments should be backed by appropriate, measurable and predictable performance goals that support these principles.”

When the Senate will take up the bill is unclear. As explained by Washington University professor Rachel Sachs, JD, MPH, in Health Affairs, Senate Republicans haven’t scheduled a vote on the legislation as they focus on efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

“It would be a shame if the collaborative, bipartisan reauthorization of the FDA’s funding were jeopardized and career public servants fired because (Senate Majority Leader Mitch) McConnell has chosen to prioritize partisan bickering on health care reform. It is the Senate’s choice to continue working on Affordable Care Act repeal to the exclusion of all else,” Sachs wrote.

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”