Are value-based pharma contracts smoke and mirrors?

Pharmaceutical companies appear to be embracing contracts where they return money if patient outcomes don’t meet goals, but similar approaches haven’t lowered costs.

ProPublica and the New York Times reported the arrangements can take on several forms, like drug makers paying rebates to insurers based on the number of the drugs sold. Pharma companies maintain plenty of control, however, deciding how those outcomes will be measured and setting the drug’s list price.

Peter Bach, MD, director of the Center for Health Policy and Outcomes at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said drug makers are acting like rebates after treatment and value-based pricing are one and the same.

“But as long as you control all the contract terms, it can be a lot of optics but no substance,” he said.

Read the full article at the link below:

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

The tirzepatide shortage that first began in 2022 has been resolved. Drug companies distributing compounded versions of the popular drug now have two to three more months to distribute their remaining supply.

The 24 members of the House Task Force on AI—12 reps from each party—have posted a 253-page report detailing their bipartisan vision for encouraging innovation while minimizing risks. 

Merck sent Hansoh Pharma, a Chinese biopharmaceutical company, an upfront payment of $112 million to license a new investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist. There could be many more payments to come if certain milestones are met.