Increasing complexity in aortic dissection reduces complications, improves outcomes—but mortality remains constant

When it comes to type A aortic dissection, cardiac surgeons have increasingly opted to perform more complex operations to reduce complications and improve postoperative care.

A study, published online June 6 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, examined cardiac surgeries from 2003 to 2015 to examine the association between a procedure’s complexity and risks faced by the patient.

“Type A aortic dissection requires emergency surgical repair,” said senior author Ravi K. Ghanta, MD, formerly of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, now with Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. “This study shows that surgeons are adapting their surgical strategies to more aggressively treat aortic dissections, surprisingly, without additional upfront risk. Therefore, patients are benefiting from more extensive repair of aortic dissection, which may lead to improved long-term outcomes.”

For this study, Ghanta and colleagues reviewed records for 884 patients who underwent operations for acute type A aortic dissection from 2003 to 2015 in Virginia. Patients were grouped by when they underwent aortic dissection (309 were in the 2003-2009 group, 316 in 2009-2012 and 259 in 2013-2015). The median age of patients was 59 years.

Results showed the operations grew in complexity over time. Aortic root surgery (16 percent, 39 percent and 67 percent, respectively) and aortic arch repair (27 percent, 26 percent and 36 percent, respectively) were more common in the latest group.

Still, the mortality risk remained constant, at 19 percent, though risks for pneumonia and reoperation were significantly lowered.

“Surgeons are increasingly comfortable with performing more extensive repairs of the aorta and utilizing new surgical techniques, and they are doing so without increasing risk,” Ghanta said. “However, while the operative mortality numbers are lower than historical outcomes, 19 percent is still significant and further improvement is needed.”

""
Nicholas Leider, Managing Editor

Nicholas joined TriMed in 2016 as the managing editor of the Chicago office. After receiving his master’s from Roosevelt University, he worked in various writing/editing roles for magazines ranging in topic from billiards to metallurgy. Currently on Chicago’s north side, Nicholas keeps busy by running, reading and talking to his two cats.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”