5 principles for safely implementing health IT

While health IT and electronic medical records (EMRs) have reduced medication errors and improved care efficiency, incorrect implementation of such systems can lead to medication errors, misdiagnoses and treatment complications.

The Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC), a Washington D.C.-based a non-profit organization pursuing politically viable policy solutions, addressed such issues in its report, Patient Safety and Information Technology: Improving Information Technology’s Role in Providing Safer Care.”

The group introduced five key principles for healthcare providers introducing an IT framework. They are:

  1. Health IT safety should be integrated into broader patient safety efforts: “Effort associated with health IT safety should not be siloed, but instead aligned with and integrated into broader patient safety efforts and programs.”
  2. Patient safety efforts should address the entire health IT life cycle: “Actions taken around maintenance, upgrades, and operations associated with health IT can also have an impact on safety. Patient safety efforts should focus on the entire life cycle of health IT.”
  3. Patient safety is a shared responsibility: “The quality of the data, the interoperability of systems and level of information sharing, and the appropriateness of clinical interventions also have an impact on safety. Education, training, and proficiency of users can also play a critical role.”
  4. A non-punitive, learning systems approach will drive improvement: “Voluntary reporting, combined with root-cause analysis, enables a greater understanding of the cause of errors and near-misses, and the ability to develop and widely disseminate solutions to prevent or address such errors, and facilitate widespread improvement.”
  5. Health IT safety approaches should be evidence-based and data-driven: “he aggregation and analysis of information from across many organizations is necessary to identify, characterize and prioritize issues that will benefit from further action.”

The report then offered three recommendations for the implementation and use of IT.

  1. Launch a coordinated leadership effort to set health IT safety priorities.
  2. Accelerate widespread dissemination of existing best practices and tools that address safety issues and gaps.
  3. Continue to advance the development and adoption of standards.

Click here to download the complete report.

""
Nicholas Leider, Managing Editor

Nicholas joined TriMed in 2016 as the managing editor of the Chicago office. After receiving his master’s from Roosevelt University, he worked in various writing/editing roles for magazines ranging in topic from billiards to metallurgy. Currently on Chicago’s north side, Nicholas keeps busy by running, reading and talking to his two cats.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”