Mold found in NIH pharmacy

Safety issues have again popped up in pharmaceuticals at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the problem this time being “environmental mold” found in a sucrose solution.

As first reported by the Washington Post, a NIH nurse discovered the contamination in the sugar-and-water mouth rinse Dec. 12, which was placed into quarantine before it was given to any patient. Nine bottles were eventually discovered to be tainted by particles cultured at NIH Clinical Center's Microbiology Section. Three of the bottles contained mold.

The clinical center had been the center of safety issues in 2015, when a FDA inspection forced the closure of a sterile production unit within the center’s Pharmaceutical Development Section. A 2016 report found while no patients had been harmed, there was a culture within NIH of placing research needs above patient safety.

NIH Director Francis Collins, MD, PhD, later acted on the safety concerns by shaking up the management team at the clinical center. Its first CEO, Major General James K. Gilman, MD, U.S. Army (retired), was selected for the role around the very time the sucrose contamination was discovered. 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”