Obama calls ACA repeal plan ‘reckless’ in NEJM article

President Barack Obama warned against repealing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in a New England Journal of Medicine article, saying without a replacement ready to take its place, the result “could slowly bleed the healthcare system that all of us depend on.”

While the essay repeated many of Obama’s defenses of the law, such as how it’s slowed the growth of healthcare costs and dropped uninsured rates to record lows, he also criticized the current strategy of repealing the law while supposedly delaying the effects until a Republican-backed replacement plan is ready. No such plan has been introduced or been subject to a cost analysis, Obama said, a different route than the debate which took place before the ACA was passed.

“If a repeal with a delay is enacted, the health care system will be standing on the edge of a cliff, resulting in uncertainty and, in some cases, harm beginning immediately,” Obama wrote.

The first dominoes to fall, Obama said, would be insurance plans on the ACA exchanges, on which insurers could offer only significantly more expensive coverage or leave altogether.

Hospitals and providers would also be affected, as care coordination efforts slow and uncompensated care costs quickly rise.

“’Repeal and replace’ is a deceptively catchy phrase,” he wrote. “The truth is that health care reform is complex, with many interlocking pieces, so that undoing some of it may undo all of it.”

One of those interlocking pieces is the individual mandate requiring people to have coverage or face a tax penalty. That provision is one of the least popular aspects of the ACA, but without it, Obama wrote it would be very difficult to keep more popular parts, like coverage for people with preexisting conditions.

The big risk with a “repeal and delay” strategy, he wrote, is that the replacement plan never materializes, leaving more people uninsured than prior to the ACA and creating an even greater burden on hospitals for uncompensated care.

In his conclusion, Obama said Congress should look to the two-party talks which crafted the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) as a guide in overhauling or replacing the ACA.

“I will applaud legislation that improves Americans’ care, but Republicans should identify improvements and explain their plan from the start—they owe the American people nothing less,” Obama wrote, adding later, “Policymakers should therefore abide by the physician’s oath: ‘first, do no harm.’”

This was the second time Obama had contributed to a medical journal in the past year. In July 2016, he published a peer-reviewed article in JAMA which also defended the ACA and called for the “public option” to be reconsidered. 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Cardiovascular devices are more likely to be in a Class I recall than any other device type. The FDA's approval process appears to be at least partially responsible, though the agency is working to make some serious changes. We spoke to a researcher who has been tracking these data for years to learn more. 

Updated compensation data includes good news for multiple subspecialties. The new report also examines private equity's impact on employment models and how much male cardiologists earn compared to females.

When drugs are on the FDA’s shortage list, outsourcing facilities can produce their own compounded versions. When the FDA removed tirzepatide from that list with no warning, it created a considerable amount of chaos both behind the scenes and in pharmacies all over the country. 

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup