Hospital budgets challenged by unpredictable increases in drug costs

Hospital spending on inpatient drugs went up by an average of 38.7 percent per admission and 23.7 percent annually between 2013 and 2015, according to a study from the American Hospital Association (AHA) and the Federation of American Hospitals (FHA).

The jump in prices is creating challenges for almost all of the 712 hospitals surveyed, with 90 percent saying the increases “had a moderate or severe effect on their ability to manage costs,” all while Medicare reimbursement failed to keep pace.

“Hospitals bear a heavy financial burden when the cost of drugs increases,” the report said. “Hospitals are significant purchasers of prescription drugs, such as anesthesia and antibiotics to prevent infections during surgery. They also treat patients suffering the repercussions of being unable to afford or otherwise access their medications, often when these individuals return through the emergency department.”

In their role as large purchasers, hospitals have been targeted by pharmaceutical companies, according to the report. In one example, the study said Valeant raised the list prices of two heart medications, Isuprel and Nitropress, by an average of more than 200 percent and 500 percent, respectively, in 2015. Certain hospitals paid even more, with the Cleveland Clinic reporting it spent more than $5.3 million on the two drugs that year.

The report said CMS reimbursement only made matters worse, saying its system “cannot keep pace with changes in drug prices” when Medicare’s pharmaceutical index is only refreshed every five to seven years. In both 2014 and 2015, the report said the growth in inpatient drug spending was well ahead of both inflation and reimbursement. In 2014, for example, spending per admission went up by 24.1 percent, while pharmaceutical price inflation increased by 6.2 percent and the Inpatient Physician Payment System update rose by 0.9 percent.

The rising costs could have major impacts on hospital budgets.

“No hospital administrator wants to make the choice between keeping the lights on, paying doctors’ and nurses’ salaries, making necessary infrastructure upgrades, or paying for drugs, especially when these price increases are not linked to new therapies or improved outcomes for patients.” FHA President and CEO Chip Kahn and AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack said in a joint blog post.  

What makes the increase more challenging, according to the report, is its unpredictability. Why many of the drugs with the biggest increases were high-volume prescriptions, that wasn’t true across the board, and the report said the rationale for pharmaceutical companies raising prices “is not immediately clear,” and sometimes may be only be caused by a change in ownership. 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”