Drug companies unhappy with Supreme Court decision on patent law challenges

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld changes to patent law made by Congress in 2011 that can make it easier for generic drug manufacturers to invalidate patents.

Though the actual case, Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. Lee, had nothing to do with brand name pharmaceuticals, its trade group had argued in the case it would “stifle innovation” by making the results of years of drug research and development harder to protect.

The issue is a process called inter partes review created by Congress in 2011. Rather than having to challenge patents through court litigation, they could be reviewed by an appeals board within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

The result, according to the Wall Street Journal, has been patents been partially or completed invalidated in more than 80 percent of the cases brought before the board.

In writing the court’s opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer says the inter partes review is a “reasonable exercise” of the Patent Office’s rulemaking authority.

“For one thing, construing a patent claim according to its broadest reasonable construction helps to protect the public. A reasonable, yet unlawfully broad claim might discourage the use of the invention by a member of the public,” Breyer wrote.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), who had backed Cuozzo in the case, said it was “disappointed” in the ruling, and maintained inter partes review sets up a process which mimics a courtroom, yet interprets patents differently.

“This dual standard threatens the predictability and strength of the protections that the patent system is supposed to provide to innovators,” PhRMA said in a statement.

Generic drug manufacturers, however, applauded the decision, arguing brand name drugmakers exploited the patent system for years to keep prices high.

“By protecting and reaffirming the importance of the inter partes review, the Court recognizes the vital need for an efficient patent review processone that promotes a competitive, affordable prescription drug market for consumers,” said Generic Pharmaceutical Association president and CEO Chip Davis. 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”