Top three needs for providers to get from volume to value

Almost half (45 percent) of providers participate in some type of alternative payment model, according to the findings of the HIMSS Cost Accounting Survey.

However, only 3 percent beleive their organization is highly prepared to make the transition from fee-for-service to a value-based payment system. Participants named the following top three needs for the transition:

  1. Tools to track and evaluate quality of care
  2. Better communication between disparate providers
  3. Consistent definition of quality by specific type of disease

Those serving in an exclusively urban market (48 percent) are more likely to participate in an alternative payment model than those exclusively serving a rural market (31 percent).

While healthcare providers have the ability to determine costs of delivering care, only 39 percent regularly review costs to ensure they are current. Seventy-two percent said they have a formal process in place for determining costs.

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”