Patients care more about use of data than consent

Patients are more concerned over how their health information is used than whether consent was obtained, according to a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Dallas-based Parkland Health and Hospital examined public support for secondary uses of electronic health information under different consent arrangements.

The nationally representative survey queried 3,064 people of diverse ethnic backgrounds (65 percent response rate) on the appropriateness of health data use as described in various vignettes.

Result findings showed that participants rated scenarios in which consent was obtained as much appropriate than when content wasn’t given, and rated marketing use of health data as less appropriate than research. Also, the respondents rated unconsented research uses as more appropriate than consented marketing uses.

“Although approaches to health information sharing emphasize consent, public opinion also emphasizes purpose, which suggests a need to focus more attention on the social value of information use,” concluded the authors.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”