How the Supreme Court decision impacted HIX enrollment

Laura Pedulli | | Health Exec | Policy & Regulations

A data analysis by The New York Times reveals that more than 3 million people would have received insurance across 24 states if the Supreme Court had ruled differently in 2012.

At that time, the court had ruled that Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act would be optional for states, prompting many states to opt out.

Read more below:

Who Would Have Health Insurance if Medicaid Expansion Weren't Optional

Laura Pedulli

Related Content

Q&A: Proposed changes to Social Security Act would recognize pharmacists as healthcare providers
10 signs AI is ‘eating the world (of venture capital)’
Mangione now faces federal charges, death penalty in murder of UHC CEO
FDA issues Class I recall on counterfeit infusion pump batteries
FDA issues alert on PCNL sheath safety after patient death
DOJ sues CVS over unlawful opioid prescriptions and reimbursement

Around the web

Cardiovascular Business
FDA says years-long tirzepatide shortage is resolved, will give limited leeway to compounders

The tirzepatide shortage that first began in 2022 has been resolved. Drug companies distributing compounded versions of the popular drug now have two to three more months to distribute their remaining supply.

AI in Healthcare
From Capitol Hill to a hospital near you? 5 federal recommendations for healthcare AI policy

The 24 members of the House Task Force on AI—12 reps from each party—have posted a 253-page report detailing their bipartisan vision for encouraging innovation while minimizing risks. 

Cardiovascular Business
Merck spends up to $2B to license new weight loss drug with potential heart benefits

Merck sent Hansoh Pharma, a Chinese biopharmaceutical company, an upfront payment of $112 million to license a new investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist. There could be many more payments to come if certain milestones are met.