Study: Advanced EHRs save on patient care

Hospitals that use advanced EHRs have lower cost per patient admission than comparable hospitals with similar case mix. - See more at: http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2014/2014-vol20-n6/Association-of-Electronic-Health-Records-With-Cost-Savings-in-a-National-Sample#sthash.POZl9Q5X.dpufHospitals that use advanced EHRs have lower cost per patient admission than comparable hospitals with similar case mix. - See more at: http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2014/2014-vol20-n6/Association-of-Electronic-Health-Records-With-Cost-Savings-in-a-National-Sample#sthash.POZl9Q5X.dpuf

Hospitals that use advanced EHRs have lower cost-per-patient admission than comparable hospitals with similar case mix, according to a recent study.

Hospitals' health IT systems were considered advanced if they met Meaningful Use requirements; they made up 18.9 percent of the sample. The study, published in the American Journal of Managed Care, included 2009 data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the Health Information and Management Systems Society.

For the study, researchers from the Medical University of South Carolina used 2009 discharge data from more than 5 million patients from 550 hospitals. Patients treated in hospitals with advanced EHRs cost, on average, $731 or 9.66 percent less than patients admitted to hospitals without advanced EHRs.

We include 5,047,089 individuals treated at 550 hospitals in the United States and represent a population-based sample. There are 104 (18.9%) hospitals included that use advanced EHRs. Patients treated in hospitals with advanced EHRs cost, on average, $731, or 9.66%, less than patients admitted to hospitals without advanced EHRs, after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.
- See more at: http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2014/2014-vol20-n6/Association-of-Electronic-Health-Records-With-Cost-Savings-in-a-National-Sample#sthash.POZl9Q5X.dpuf

The study noted that advanced EHR use requires a costly investment for hospitals that can be regained through savings in patient care. "Hospitals must anticipate that the financial savings may not exist until advanced, 'Meaningful' Use is attained," according to the authors. "The majority of hospitals have yet to reach the stage of implementation where cost savings are possible, since they are not using advanced EHRs."

 

Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”