AHIMA: EHRs can lead to better coding, more accurate reimbursement

When used correctly, EHRs produce more accurate documentation leading to more complete coding, and ultimately, more accurate reimbursement claims, according to Sue Bowman, senior director of coding policy and compliance of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA). Bowman presented during a listening session hosted by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology. The session, “Billing and Coding with Electronic Health Records,” convened stakeholders including providers, health association leaders, health IT vendors and others to discuss EHRs, increased billing for some services and appropriate coding in an increasingly electronic environment. During her presentation on developing EHR coding standards, Bowman called for more research on the causes of higher levels of coding and reimbursement. “The extent to which EHRs have led to improper reimbursement is unclear,” Bowman said. “EHRs produce more complete and accurate documentation, and this could be leading medical providers to seek reimbursement for services they have always been providing, but weren’t properly documenting before. Higher levels of reimbursement do not necessarily equate to fraud.” EHRs offer many benefits, including saving time, prompting clinicians for documentatio, and improving consistency and completeness in medical records, said Bowman. On the other hand, they also have some features that can be risky if improperly used, like copy/paste, auto-creation of default documentation and templates with limited options. “If EHR systems are not properly designed and used, they can lead to inaccurate, outdated or misleading information,” said Bowman. “That’s why all EHR users should receivecomprehensive training and education on how to use them correctly. Real improvements in documentation and coding should be rewarded, and misuse should be punished.” To address the problems concerns about EHRs, AHIMA made several recommendations, including the following:
  • A code of ethics for both EHR vendors and users to design and use the systems correctly, and shared accountability for ensuring compliant documentation and coding practices;
  • Organization guidelines to assure the features of an EHR are used correctly, addressing issues such as acceptable ways to capture information, limitations on certain features and correct copy/paste practices;
  • A national set of coding guidelines by CMS for hospital reporting of emergency department and clinic visits; and
  • Education and training on EHR use for all who access it.
  
Beth Walsh,

Editor

Editor Beth earned a bachelor’s degree in journalism and master’s in health communication. She has worked in hospital, academic and publishing settings over the past 20 years. Beth joined TriMed in 2005, as editor of CMIO and Clinical Innovation + Technology. When not covering all things related to health IT, she spends time with her husband and three children.

Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup