HIMSS roundtable finds common ground

Mary Stevens, Editor
Image source: TriMed Media Group
Twenty states are now pursuing a legal battle against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Likewise, the Massachusetts universal insurance coverage plan certainly has its faults and faces an army of vocal detractors. However, the technological underpinnings of “the Mass. model” for EHR adoption and information exchange have earned high marks in some circles for being consensus-based and encompassing both public and private interests.

At a HIMSS Roundtable Webinar discussion yesterday, a state senator, the director of the Massachusetts eHealth Initiative and the senior vice president and CIO of the state’s largest insurer united to make this point.

The Bay State took “a fairly bold step” in 2006 to expand access to health insurance well in advance of the current federal program, said Massachusetts state Sen. Richard Moore. “We recognized the role of health IT in the process, probably because we have a lot of health IT leaders from our state, and we were able to work with them early on as we were crafting our healthcare reform initiative,” he said.

“We see health IT maybe not as the answer to everything … but clearly, if we are to have accountable care organizations and medical home, and manage conditions, we need the resources that HIT can provide.”

The senator went on to provide my favorite quote of the week: “This one area that nobody is going to want to repeal. If you can get John Kerry and Newt Gingrich on same stage singing HIT’s praises, it’s not an ideological issue. … We believe everybody recognizes the importance of using this technology to deliver best possible care.” Here’s hoping.

The challenges of building the health IT framework are on many physicians’ and policymakers’ minds, including the ONC. Getting the Massachusetts plan up and running--and supported--has been a coordinated effort to understand and then explain what infrastructure would need to be adopted, and what would be expected of stakeholders, said Richard Shoup, PhD, director of the Massachusetts eHealth Initiative (MeHI), the state’s Regional Extension Center. Shoup’s organization kept lines of communication open, using a physician group of champions to talk up REC, a website and member-only portal to get the word out, he said.

Both Moore and Shoup said they were also very encouraged by federal efforts to strengthen the healthcare workforce, including training technicians as well as doctors and nurses to keep the system running and protect the privacy of patients. Training programs could help produce 23,000 jobs in the state alone, and technicians will be vital if the health coverage initiative in Massachusetts is to stay on track.

I think we’ve got the right team to get us there,” said Moore. “We think we’re No. 1 and we want to stay there. [But] we challenge the rest of the country to catch up.”

Any takers? Let me know at mstevens@trimedmedia.com

 



Around the web

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”

FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said the clinical community needs to combat health misinformation at a grassroots level. He warned that patients are immersed in a "sea of misinformation without a compass."

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup