JACR: NIH to measure, track radiation dose with medical imaging
 |
The authors touched upon the continuing controversy surrounding diagnostic medical radiation exposure. “One widely publicized appraisal of medical radiation exposure suggested that about 1.5 to 2 percent of all cancers in the U.S. might be caused by the clinical use of CT alone,” said lead author David A. Bluemke, MD, director of radiology and imaging sciences at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, Md.
“Since there is no epidemiologic data directly relating CT scanning to cancer deaths, scientific assessment must instead rely on the relationship between radiation exposure and death rates from Japanese atomic bomb survivors,” said Bluemke. “While the legitimacy of this approach remains debated, radiologists as well as clinicians may rightfully be confused by the ongoing controversy. Patients seeking medical help may legitimately question the rationale of, and any risks from, diagnostic radiology tests.”
Radiology and nuclear medicine at the NIH Clinical Center have developed a radiation reporting policy, first announced in August 2009, which will be instituted in cooperation with major equipment vendors, beginning with exposures from CT and PET/CT, according to the authors.
“All vendors who sell imaging equipment to radiology and imaging sciences at the NIH Clinical Center will be required to provide a routine means for radiation dose exposure to be recorded in the EMR. This requirement will allow cataloging of radiation exposures from these medical tests,” said Bluemke.
In addition, radiology at NIH will also require that vendors ensure that radiation exposure can be tracked by the patient in their own personal health record, according to the authors. They added that the approach is consistent with the American College of Radiology’s and Radiological Society of North America’s recommendations, that “patients should keep a record of their x-ray history.”
“The cancer risk from low-dose medical radiation tests is largely unknown. Yet it is clear that the U.S. population is increasingly being exposed to more diagnostic-test-derived ionizing radiation than in the past,” said Bluemke.
“While these steps themselves are not sufficient to allow population-based assessment of cancer risk from low-dose radiation, they are nonetheless necessary to begin a data set for this determination,” Bluemke said. “The accumulation of medical testing doses of hundreds of thousands of individuals in the U.S. over many years will ultimately be necessary. We encourage all medical imaging facilities to include similar requirements for radiation-dose reporting outputs from the manufacturers of radiation-producing medical equipment.”
See "How Much Is Too Much? Tracking Radiation Dose through an EMR" in the January issue of CMIO for more information about healthcare facilities tracking radiation dosage via patients' medical records.