IBM examines best methods to reduce bias around AI in healthcare

Biases in medical AI algorithms can have critical implications for minority patients, which is why IBM Research and Watson Health researchers have launched a new study to examine the best methods for addressing this problem.

The study, which was recently published in JAMA Network Open, examined the impacts of various AI algorithms on a very common condition impacting pregnant women. The researchers analyzed postpartum depression and mental health usage among nearly 600,000 women covered by Medicaid and sought out the presence of algorithmic bias. They then introduced and assessed methods to combat those biases.

The researchers first looked for bias in training data and then applied debiasing methods called reweighing9 and Prejudice Remover to mitigate any bias. They then compared the two models to another debiasing method that completely removes race from the data, called Fairness Through Unawareness (FTU).

Unsurprisingly, the study revealed AI algorithms trained on biased data can have unfair outcomes for some patients of a different demographic. White women, which made up 55% of the cohort, were more likely to be diagnosed with postpartum depression and had higher incidence of mental health services.

The finding goes against medical literature, which dictates higher rates of PPD among minority women is more commonly observed. That indicates underlying disparities “in timely evaluation, screening, and symptom detection among Black women,” wrote first author Yoonyoung Park, ScD, of the Center for Computational Health, IBM Research, et al. 

Machine learning models also predicted unequal outcomes, favoring white women who were already at a disadvantage for diagnosis and treatment. Among Black women who were predicted to be similarly at a higher risk, there was a worse health status. 

Disregarding race in the models was “inferior,” the study authors said, while the two deabiasing methods would actually allocate more resources toward Black women compared to the baseline or FTU model. In other words, the debiasing methods would help produce fairer outcomes for patients.

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”