AI decision aid improves patient outcomes

An AI decision aid significantly improved decision quality, level of shared decision-making, patient satisfaction and functional outcomes in patients compared to an education-only approach, according to a new study in JAMA.

The study analyzed a randomized clinical trial of 129 patients with knee osteoarthritis who were considering total knee replacement. Researchers wanted to assess the effect of an AI-enabled patient decision aid on a number of measures, including decision quality, patient experience, functional outcomes, and process-level outcomes. The aid included education, preference assessment and personalized outcome estimations and was compared against education only.

Sixty-nine patients were put into the intervention group with the AI decision aid, with 60 patients in the control group. The intervention group had better decision quality, collaborative decision-making, satisfaction and improved functional outcomes at four to six months. This group also did not experience any longer consultation times, which can help surgeons use their consultation time more efficiently.

“These findings suggest that AI-enabled decision aids incorporating patient-reported outcome measurement data provide a personalized, data-driven approach to shared decision-making for the surgical management of knee osteoarthritis,” wrote first author Prakash Jayakumar, MBBS, DPhil, of Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, et al. 

The findings could help patients who are considering a total knee replacement procedure, which is one of the most common procedures in the U.S. but is considered “high stakes,” Jayakumar et al. described.

“For all individuals with advanced knee OA, this decision aid may better address patient expectations around symptom relief, improvement in physical function, and psychosocial wellness, as well as provide clarity around fears, attitudes, and the risks and benefits of surgery,” the authors wrote.

Healthcare teams can also benefit from the decision aid by aligning patient preferences and expectations. Visual elements of the decision aid can be useful for healthcare teams to show patients their personalized care options. Researchers used patient assessments with the AI tool to further aid in decision making, enriching the surgeon-patient discussion, according to the researchers.

“Patients using the tool may feel more involved, informed, and in control of the decision-making process,” they wrote.

However, for decision aid technology to become widespread, surgeons will require in-depth training on the complex data points collected.

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”