Playing the percentages on face masks: 5 points to ponder

Around the world during the COVID-19 pandemic, words have occasionally led to blows over people in public not wearing face masks. Then too, fisticuffs have erupted over people in public wearing face masks.

Part of the problem may lie with the inherent inconstancy of the variables—mask styles, materials, fit, placement and so on.

And that’s to say nothing of the politicization of the commentary circulating online.

This further confounds evidence-based decision-making, especially outside of healthcare settings.  

Science journalist Lynne Peeples breaks it all down, citing anecdotal observations as well as scientific studies, in a 3,000-word news analysis published Oct. 6 in Nature.

Here’s the gist of five enlightening percentage-based points on which Peeples expounds.

1. A heavyweight cotton T-shirt, presumably pulled far enough up over the face, could block 50% of inhaled aerosols and almost 80% of exhaled aerosols measuring 2 micrometers across.  

2. Surgical and cloth masks of similar design may be under 70% effective at protecting the wearer.

3. In the U.S., mask-wearing in public spaces hit 50% in late July and has stayed there since.

4. That’s a significant jump from the 20% reported in March and April.

5. If the U.S. were to increase mask use to Singapore-like levels—95%—some 100,000 lives might be saved by this coming New Year’s Day.

“To be clear, the science supports using masks, with recent studies suggesting that they could save lives in different ways: Research shows that they cut down the chances of both transmitting and catching the coronavirus, and some studies hint that masks might reduce the severity of infection if people do contract the disease,” Peeples writes. “But being more definitive about how well they work or when to use them gets complicated.”

Read the whole thing.

Dave Pearson

Dave P. has worked in journalism, marketing and public relations for more than 30 years, frequently concentrating on hospitals, healthcare technology and Catholic communications. He has also specialized in fundraising communications, ghostwriting for CEOs of local, national and global charities, nonprofits and foundations.

Around the web

A string of executive orders from the White House created serious concerns among radiologists and other healthcare providers throughout the United States. The American College of Radiology issued a statement to help guide its members through the chaos. 

Bridgefield Capital, founded in 2015, has previously invested in such popular brands as Cirque Du Soleil, Del Monte and Quiksilver. This transaction is expected to be completed in the second half of 2025. 

Given the precarious excitement of the moment—or is it exciting precarity?—policymakers and healthcare leaders must set directives guiding not only what to do with AI but also when to do it.