DOJ to take on Sutter Health in False Claims Act lawsuit

The U.S. government has jumped into a False Claims Act lawsuit stemming from a whistleblower against Sutter Health, a healthcare services company based in California, and its affiliate Palo Alto Medical Foundation.

Sutter allegedly violated the act by submitting inaccurate information about the health status of some Medicare Advantage enrollees, according to the Justice Department. MA plans, which are private insurance plans that contract with Medicare, are paid a per-person amount to provide services and care covered by regular Medicare. Those rates are based on demographic information and health status, designated as risk scores. Enrollees with higher risk scores generally have a higher risk-adjusted payment.

“Federal healthcare programs rely on the accuracy of information submitted by healthcare providers to ensure that patients are afforded the appropriate level of care and that managed care plans receive appropriate compensation,” Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division said in a statement. “Today’s action sends a clear message that we will seek to hold healthcare providers responsible if they fail to ensure that the information they submit is truthful.” 

Sutter contracted with Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) to care for MA enrollees in California and received a share of the CMS payments from the MAOs in return, according to the DOJ. Sutter submitted diagnoses to the MAOs, which then submitted those diagnosis codes to CMS for risk calculation from office visits, hospital stays and other medical encounters.

Sutter Health and Palo Alto Medical Foundation “knowingly submitted unsupported diagnosis codes” for certain patients that allegedly inflated the risks scores and, therefore, resulted in higher payments, according to the lawsuit. Sutter also failed to take sufficient corrective action once it became aware of the unsupported diagnoses, the lawsuit alleges.

The case is not the first bout of trouble for Sutter Health, which came under fire in 2017 for allegedly destroying documents sought in an antitrust lawsuit against the not-for-profit healthcare company.

"Sutter Health and Palo Alto Medical Foundation take the issues raised in the complaint seriously," Amy Thoma Tan, director of public affairs and issues management at Sutter Health, told HealthExec in an emailed statement. "The lawsuit involves an area of law that is currently unsettled and the subject of ongoing litigation in multiple jurisdictions. Sutter Health intends to vigorously defend itself against the allegations in the complaint."

Amy Baxter

Amy joined TriMed Media as a Senior Writer for HealthExec after covering home care for three years. When not writing about all things healthcare, she fulfills her lifelong dream of becoming a pirate by sailing in regattas and enjoying rum. Fun fact: she sailed 333 miles across Lake Michigan in the Chicago Yacht Club "Race to Mackinac."

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”