72% of life science professionals see their industry struggling with AI

Nearly three-fourths of life science professionals believe their sector is behind others in the development of artificial intelligence (AI), according to a survey conducted by the Pistoia Alliance.

The survey, which included the responses from 229 life science professionals in May 2018, aimed to provide insight into the development of best practices and adoption strategies.

“AI is a multidisciplinary field that needs many inputs to make it effective, and we often hear from our members that making links with other industries, such as the technology sector, is a barrier to AI’s evolution,” said Nick Lynch, cofounder of the Pistoia Alliance. “Additionally, there are many concerns around whether AI will ‘take’ our jobs, and how we can ensure AI is ethical and unbiased.”

Key findings included:

  • 72 percent of life science professionals believed their sector was lagging behind other industries in its development of AI.
  • 69 percent of companies surveyed were using AI, machine learning, deep learning and chatbots, an increase from 44 percent in 2017.
  • 19 percent reported they planned to use AI within the next 12 months,
  • 12 percent of life science professionals were not using AI.
  • 21 percent of respondents did not believe their projects were providing meaningful outcomes, and 21 percent didn’t know if projects were delivering meaningful outcomes.

“This survey shows interest in AI remains strong, but there is still a challenge with moving past the hype to a realty where AI is delivering insights with the power to truly augment researchers’ work,” commented Steve Arlington, president of the Pistoia Alliance. “It is significant that a majority of people in our own industry believe we are trailing other sectors in the use of AI, and we must address this issue by working closely with each other and with stakeholders in other sectors. Spaces to virtually collaborate will become even more critical as political and social shifts —from Brexit to changes to U.S. immigration laws—impact how scientists share knowledge and ideas. AI is poised to have a radical impact on life sciences and healthcare, but the industry must give researchers the best chance of success.”

""
Cara Livernois, News Writer

Cara joined TriMed Media in 2016 and is currently a Senior Writer for Clinical Innovation & Technology. Originating from Detroit, Michigan, she holds a Bachelors in Health Communications from Grand Valley State University.

Around the web

Compensation for heart specialists continues to climb. What does this say about cardiology as a whole? Could private equity's rising influence bring about change? We spoke to MedAxiom CEO Jerry Blackwell, MD, MBA, a veteran cardiologist himself, to learn more.

The American College of Cardiology has shared its perspective on new CMS payment policies, highlighting revenue concerns while providing key details for cardiologists and other cardiology professionals. 

As debate simmers over how best to regulate AI, experts continue to offer guidance on where to start, how to proceed and what to emphasize. A new resource models its recommendations on what its authors call the “SETO Loop.”