Princeton health economist says ACA death spiral has arrived

With rising premiums and the departure of major insurers, there’s been plenty of pessimism towards the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance exchanges, but Princeton University health economist Uwe Reinhardt, PhD, has an even harsher assessment on their future.

“We all know about the death spiral that actuaries worry about, and I think what you’re seeing now is a mild version of that,” Reinhardt said in an interview with Vox’s Sarah Kliff. “These things accelerate, as premiums keep rising.”

Reinhardt bases his doom and gloom prediction on how the U.S. health care system differs from those of Switzerland and Germany, where he says the insurance mandate is “brutally” enforced and benefits packages offered by private insurers are standardized.

Such a system would be hard to establish in the U.S., Reinhardt says, consider the fierce opposition generated against the ACA’s existing mandate. But he’s clearly not enthusiastic about the future of the exchanges and the ACA in general.

“I always joke about it like this: If you got a bunch of Princeton undergrads to design a health care system, maybe they would come up with an arrangement like the marketplaces,” he said.

It’s a far different assessment than UCLA Center for Health Policy Research Director Gerald Kominski, PhD, had for HealthExec earlier in the year, when he said the insurers’ exits weren’t a death spiral, but a “political game of brinkmanship” to get insurer subsidies extended.

To read the full interview with Reinhardt, click on the link below: 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

With generative AI coming into its own, AI regulators must avoid relying too much on principles of risk management—and not enough on those of uncertainty management.

Cardiovascular devices are more likely to be in a Class I recall than any other device type. The FDA's approval process appears to be at least partially responsible, though the agency is working to make some serious changes. We spoke to a researcher who has been tracking these data for years to learn more. 

Updated compensation data includes good news for multiple subspecialties. The new report also examines private equity's impact on employment models and how much male cardiologists earn compared to females.

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup