HHS: Providers can’t use Patient Safety Act to prevent patient access to data

New guidance from HHS’s Office of Civil Rights and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clarified that providers can’t use the Patient Safety Act to stop patients who believed they were harmed from obtaining records about their care.

The 22-page document addressed providers that “may be attempting to misuse the Patient Safety Act protections to avoid their external obligations,” work around federal and state regulations, and withhold individual records that could be used to sue providers.

The guidance included two examples of the way the law has been misinterpreted. First, some providers have been improperly maintaining required records as reports for a patient safety evaluation system (PSES), and claiming those records must be kept confidential. Second, the guidance accused some providers of making duplicate copies of patient records, which should remain accessible, placing them in safety reports and then destroying the originals.

“The Patient Safety Act was not intended to give providers such methods to evade their regulatory obligations,” the guidance said.

The document specifically warned against destroying records, advising providers to exercise “extreme caution” and taking the stance that destroying original documents on which a patient safety work product is based doesn’t absolve the provider from regulatory consequences.

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

With generative AI coming into its own, AI regulators must avoid relying too much on principles of risk management—and not enough on those of uncertainty management.

Cardiovascular devices are more likely to be in a Class I recall than any other device type. The FDA's approval process appears to be at least partially responsible, though the agency is working to make some serious changes. We spoke to a researcher who has been tracking these data for years to learn more. 

Updated compensation data includes good news for multiple subspecialties. The new report also examines private equity's impact on employment models and how much male cardiologists earn compared to females.

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup