How Molina found a profitable strategy for ACA exchanges

While larger insurers like UnitedHealthcare and Aetna have complained of losing hundreds of millions of dollars on the Affordable Care Act’s exchanges, Molina Healthcare has turned a slim profit by applying its Medicaid management strategies to the new marketplace.

The Wall Street Journal reported on one Molina customer’s story which is common for many under their plans: initially, they’re concerned about the limitations of the health maintenance organization plan, but “when we had to make the first premium payment, we got over that quickly,” said 56-year-old Elizabeth Wolfe.

Wolfe pays $52 per month for a Molina plan which covers her and her husband, with federal subsidies picking up some of the cost.

Molina’s profit margins on its exchange business are slim—somewhere in the 1.5 to 2 percent range—but they’re in the black, unlike many other exchange participants. It’s winning strategy is similar to how they’ve managed Medicaid patients for years: using narrow provider networks, rigorous cost control and close management of patients’ health.

“We are attracting and managing a similar population to what we have managed for the last 36 years” in Medicaid plans, Lisa Rubino, a Molina senior vice president, said to the Journal. “Making our products affordable at the premium level is job No. 1.”

For more on how other insurers could walk a similar path towards profitability on the exchanges, click on the link below: 

""
John Gregory, Senior Writer

John joined TriMed in 2016, focusing on healthcare policy and regulation. After graduating from Columbia College Chicago, he worked at FM News Chicago and Rivet News Radio, and worked on the state government and politics beat for the Illinois Radio Network. Outside of work, you may find him adding to his never-ending graphic novel collection.

Around the web

With generative AI coming into its own, AI regulators must avoid relying too much on principles of risk management—and not enough on those of uncertainty management.

Cardiovascular devices are more likely to be in a Class I recall than any other device type. The FDA's approval process appears to be at least partially responsible, though the agency is working to make some serious changes. We spoke to a researcher who has been tracking these data for years to learn more. 

Updated compensation data includes good news for multiple subspecialties. The new report also examines private equity's impact on employment models and how much male cardiologists earn compared to females.

Trimed Popup
Trimed Popup